Rhetorical Analyst Skill for Claude & AI Agents


The Rhetorical Analyst skill (rhetorical-analyst) turns Claude into a rigorous debate analyst. It evaluates any argumentative text — a debate, a comment thread, a speech, an article — across three separate dimensions: does it work emotionally (persuasion), is the structure sound (rhetoric), and do the premises actually support the conclusion (logic)? A move can score high on persuasion and low on logic at the same time — the skill never collapses the three into one verdict.

It is for anyone who wants to understand why something feels persuasive but wrong, stress-test their own arguments before publishing, or break down what is actually happening in a heated exchange. The skill maps the rhetorical moves one by one, exposes hidden assumptions, tracks missing inferential steps, and checks whether the same evidential standard is applied to both sides — including by the analyst itself.

Get Started

1
Create an Account

Sign up for a free InfraNodus account to get access to the knowledge graph tools and your API key.

Create a Free Account
2
Get InfraNodus MCP
https://mcp.infranodus.com

Add this URL as a connector via Settings > Connectors in Claude Web / Desktop and authenticate with your InfraNodus API key via OAuth.

3
Install the Skill
/plugin marketplace add infranodus/skills
/plugin install skill-rhetorical-analyst@infranodus-skills

Run these two commands in the Claude Code prompt to install the skill as a plugin (use infranodus-all@infranodus-skills to install all our skills at once). Or use npx in your terminal:

npx skills add infranodus/skills --skill skill-rhetorical-analyst -g -a claude-code -y

npx comes bundled with Node.js. For Claude Web / Desktop, ChatGPT, and OpenClaw, see the full installation instructions.

Didn't work? You can simply download skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip from our GitHub repository and add it to your LLM client manually — see the step-by-step instructions.

What the Skill Does

Once installed, prompts like these trigger the full analysis workflow:

  • "Analyze this argument" — maps each argumentative move (moral reframe, partial concession, burden shifting, tu quoque, etc.) and scores it on persuasion, rhetoric, and logic.
  • "What's wrong with this reasoning?" — finds the missing inferential steps: the premises the argument requires but never states.
  • "Why is this persuasive?" — separates rhetorical force from logical force, showing where intensity fills the gap where a premise should be.
  • "Break down this debate" — tracks principle shifts, concessions, and asymmetric standards across a whole exchange.
  • "Is this a good point?" — reconstructs the strongest version of the argument first, then names the genuine remaining weakness.
  • "Stress-test my argument" — applies the same standards to your own text, so you can fix the gaps before an opponent finds them.

A core principle of the skill is symmetry: if the analysis consistently asks one side to justify itself while letting the other side's assumptions pass unchallenged, that asymmetry is itself a bias to name and correct. It also keeps hypocrisy, sincere error, and structural dysfunction distinct — three different failure modes that require different evidential bars — and distinguishes understanding a logic from endorsing it.

How It Works

The skill's key idea is that structural analysis precedes linear reading. When the InfraNodus MCP server is connected, the first three steps are mandatory tool calls that map the argument as a network before any moves are identified:

StepToolWhat it reveals
1. Map the terraingenerate_topical_clustersWhich concepts dominate the argument's network. Key diagnostic: does the stated topic match the structurally central cluster? When an argument claims to be about X but is organized around Y, that divergence reveals the hidden operative premise.
2. Find structural gapsgenerate_content_gapsConcepts that would connect the clusters but are absent — these map directly onto missing inferential steps. Each gap is classified as a flaw, a concealment, or a co-authorship space the audience fills with their own premises.
3. Diagnose biasoptimize_text_structureWhether the argument is tribally over-concentrated or too dispersed to make a point. The question mode generates the questions the argument's own structure implies it should be answering but isn't.

Only then does the skill read the argument sequentially: it names each move, scores it on the three dimensions with a specific mechanism ("weak logic" is never enough — it names the tu quoque, the false equivalence, the missing premise), finds the hidden joints where the argument needs one more step to be complete, and finally checks its own frame — asking whether it treated one position as the default and the other as the claim requiring justification.

The skill also carries a library of effective debate techniques (compressing a reductio into a single question, the consistency challenge, naming principle shifts, the concession audit) and a reference table of common fallacies with their tells. Without the MCP server it still runs the linear workflow — the analysis is valid, but gap findings are intuited rather than structurally derived.

Install the Skill

Claude Code

Download the skill into your global skills folder:

cd ~/.claude/skills
curl -L -o skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip https://github.com/infranodus/skills/releases/latest/download/skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip
unzip skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip -d skill-rhetorical-analyst

Then just ask Claude to "analyze this argument" or "break down this debate" — the skill activates automatically.

Claude Web / Desktop

Go to Settings > Capabilities, enable Code execution and file creation, scroll to the Skills section, and upload the skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip file.

OpenClaw

Run in the OpenClaw chat:

install this skill: https://github.com/infranodus/skills/releases/latest/download/skill-rhetorical-analyst.zip

See the main installation guide for step-by-step instructions per LLM client.

Works Best with the InfraNodus MCP Server

The skill works without any server — the move-mapping, scoring, and frame-checking are self-contained. But its structural steps (topical clusters, content gaps, bias diagnosis) need the InfraNodus MCP server connected to your LLM client. With it, the gaps the skill names emerge from the argument's own network structure, which makes them much harder to dismiss as the analyst's imposition.