somebody wants to talk to me, but the I do not want to talk to this person

14222098710000000

×

PNG (Image) SVG (Hi-Res)

JSON CSV Gexf (Gephi)

CSV tagged w Topics Blocks with Topics Plain Text

Download the Graph Image:

PNG (Image) SVG (Hi-Res)

Download the Graph Data:

JSON CSV Gexf (Gephi)

Download the Text Data:

CSV tagged w Topics Blocks with Topics Plain Text

×

Save / Rename This Graph:

×

InfraNodus
Delete This Graph:

Top keywords (global influence):

Top topics (local contexts):

Explore the main topics and terms outlined above or see them in the excerpts from this text below.

See the relevant data in context: click here to show the excerpts from this text that contain these topics below.

Tip: use the form below to save the most relevant keywords for this search query. Or start writing your content and see how it relates to the existing search queries and results.

Tip: here are the keyword queries that people search for but don't actually find in the search results.

somebody wants to talk to me, but the I do not want to talk to this person

14222098710000000

i can be rude and refuse to talk or I can also go against my #will and talk to that person - i do not want any of that

14222099010000000

if I speak to the person I will not feel good because I want to be alone now

14222102240000000

I feel like being alone because I want to be left in peace and think over something

14222102480000000

I need to think about the work that I have to do – writing a post on my website about using the graphs for psychotherapeutic purposes.

14222102770000000

i want to think about my work on my own and i do not want to speak about it with this person. i do not even know them. what's the point?

14222113660000000

well... i want to write about how you can use graphs to increase the number of choices available to you in every situation.

14222116580000000

i mean i did not have enough time to write that post before, so right now i need to work and that person wants to speak, so I cannot do that, you know? what kind of stupid question is that?

14222119930000000

you know what? maybe I can just tell the guy that hey, I'm working on making a post about using the graphs to expand the range of the possibilities that we have at our disposal and so I really do not want to be rude, but I cannot talk right now... but when I'm ready I'll be happy to discuss it with them if they feel it could be something interesting for them as well...

14222125630000000

Show Labels for Nodes > 0 size:

0 0

Default Label Size: 0

0 20

Edges Type:

Layout Type:

Reset to Default

Language Processing Settings:

× ⁝⁝

× ⁝⁝

The higher is the network's structure diversity and the higher is the alpha in the influence propagation score, the higher is its mind-viral immunity — that is, such network will be more resilient and adaptive than a less diverse one.

In case of a discourse network, high mind-viral immunity means that the text proposes multiple points of view and propagates its influence using both highly influential concepts and smaller, secondary topics.

In case of a discourse network, high mind-viral immunity means that the text proposes multiple points of view and propagates its influence using both highly influential concepts and smaller, secondary topics.

The higher is the diversity, the more distinct communities (topics) there are in this network, the more likely it will be pluralist.

The network structure indicates the level of its diversity. It is based on the modularity measure (>0.4 for medium, >0.65 for high modularity, measured with Louvain (Blondel et al 2008) community detection algorithm) in combination with the measure of influence distribution (the entropy of the top nodes' distribution among the top clusters), as well as the the percentage of nodes in the top community.

Modularity | 0 |
Influence Distribution | 0 % |
---|

Topics | Nodes in Top Topic | Components | Nodes in Top Comp |

0 |
0 % |
0 |
0 % |

Nodes | Av Degree | Density | Weighed Betweenness |

0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |

Narrative Influence Propagation:

? The chart above shows how influence propagates through the network. X-axis: lemma to lemma step (narrative chronology). Y-axis: change of influence.

The more even and rhythmical this propagation is, the stronger is the central idea or agenda (see alpha exponent below ~ 0.5 or less).

The more variability can be seen in the propagation profile, the less is the reliance on the main concepts (agenda), the stronger is the role of secondary topical clusters in the narrative.

The more even and rhythmical this propagation is, the stronger is the central idea or agenda (see alpha exponent below ~ 0.5 or less).

The more variability can be seen in the propagation profile, the less is the reliance on the main concepts (agenda), the stronger is the role of secondary topical clusters in the narrative.

We plot the narrative as a time series of influence (using the words' betweenness score). We then apply detrended fluctuation analysis to identify fractality of this time series, plotting the log2 scales (x) to the log2 of accumulated fluctuations (y). If the resulting loglog relation can be approximated on a linear polyfit, there may be a power-law relation in how the influence propagates in this narrative over time (e.g. most of the time non-influential words, occasionally words with a high influence).

Using the alpha exponent of the fit (which is closely related to Hurst exponent)), we can better understand the nature of this relation: uniform (pulsating | alpha <= 0.65), variable (stationary, has long-term correlations | 0.65 < alpha <= 0.85), fractal (adaptive | 0.85 < alpha < 1.15), and complex (non-stationary | alpha >= 1.15).

For maximal diversity, adaptivity, and plurality, the narrative should be close to "fractal" (near-critical state). For fiction, essays, and some forms of poetry — "uniform". Informative texts will often have "variable + stationary" score. The "complex" state is an indicator that the text is always shifting its state.

Using the alpha exponent of the fit (which is closely related to Hurst exponent)), we can better understand the nature of this relation: uniform (pulsating | alpha <= 0.65), variable (stationary, has long-term correlations | 0.65 < alpha <= 0.85), fractal (adaptive | 0.85 < alpha < 1.15), and complex (non-stationary | alpha >= 1.15).

For maximal diversity, adaptivity, and plurality, the narrative should be close to "fractal" (near-critical state). For fiction, essays, and some forms of poetry — "uniform". Informative texts will often have "variable + stationary" score. The "complex" state is an indicator that the text is always shifting its state.

Degree Distribution:

? (based on kolmogorov-smirnov test) ? switch to linear

Using this information, you can identify whether the network has scale-free / small-world (long-tail power law distribution) or random (normal, bell-shaped distribution) network properties.

This may be important for understanding the level of resilience and the dynamics of propagation in this network. E.g. scale-free networks with long degree tails are more resilient against random attacks and will propagate information across the whole structure better.

This may be important for understanding the level of resilience and the dynamics of propagation in this network. E.g. scale-free networks with long degree tails are more resilient against random attacks and will propagate information across the whole structure better.

If a power-law is identified, the nodes have preferential attachment (e.g. 20% of nodes tend to get 80% of connections), and the network may be scale-free, which may indicate that it's more resilient and adaptive. Absence of power law may indicate a more equalized distribution of influence.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test compares the distribution above to the "ideal" power-law ones (^1, ^1.5, ^2) and looks for the best fit. If the value d is below the critical value cr it is a sign that the both distributions are similar.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test compares the distribution above to the "ideal" power-law ones (^1, ^1.5, ^2) and looks for the best fit. If the value d is below the critical value cr it is a sign that the both distributions are similar.

× ⁝⁝

*please, add your data to display the stats...*+ ⤓ ? ⤓

*please, add your data to display the stats...*+ ⤓ ↻ ?

Reset Graph Export: Show Options

*loading...*
⤓ ? ⤓

*loading...*

positive: | negative: | neutral:

⤓ ? ⤓

?

Main Topical Groups:

The topics are the nodes (words) that tend to co-occur together in the same context (next to each other).

We use a combination of clustering and graph community detection algorithm (Blondel et al based on Louvain) to identify the groups of nodes are more densely connected together than with the rest of the network. They are aligned closer to each other on the graph using the Force Atlas algorithm (Jacomy et al) and are given a distinct color.

We use a combination of clustering and graph community detection algorithm (Blondel et al based on Louvain) to identify the groups of nodes are more densely connected together than with the rest of the network. They are aligned closer to each other on the graph using the Force Atlas algorithm (Jacomy et al) and are given a distinct color.

Most Influential Elements:

We use the Jenks elbow cutoff algorithm to select the top prominent nodes that have significantly higher influence than the rest.

Click the Reveal Non-obvious button to remove the most influential words (or the ones you select) from the graph, to see what terms are hiding behind them.

The most influential nodes are either the ones with the highest betweenness centrality — appearing most often on the shortest path between any two randomly chosen nodes (i.e. linking the different distinct communities) — or the ones with the highest degree.

Click the Reveal Non-obvious button to remove the most influential words (or the ones you select) from the graph, to see what terms are hiding behind them.

The most influential nodes are either the ones with the highest betweenness centrality — appearing most often on the shortest path between any two randomly chosen nodes (i.e. linking the different distinct communities) — or the ones with the highest degree.

Network Structure:

N/A

?The network structure indicates the level of its diversity. It is based on the modularity measure (>0.4 for medium, >0.65 for high modularity, measured with Louvain (Blondel et al 2008) community detection algorithm) in combination with the measure of influence distribution (the entropy of the top nodes' distribution among the top clusters), as well as the the percentage of nodes in the top community.

Reset Graph Export: Show Options

Action Advice:

N/A

Structural Gap

(ask a research question that would link these two topics):N/A

?A structural gap shows the two distinct communities (clusters of words) in this graph that are important, but not yet connected. That's where the new potential and innovative ideas may reside.

This measure is based on a combination of the graph's connectivity and community structure, selecting the groups of nodes that would either make the graph more connected if it's too dispersed or that would help maintain diversity if it's too connected.

This measure is based on a combination of the graph's connectivity and community structure, selecting the groups of nodes that would either make the graph more connected if it's too dispersed or that would help maintain diversity if it's too connected.

Latent Topical Brokers

:
N/A

?These are the latent brokers between the topics: the nodes that have an unusually high rate of influence (betweenness centrality) to their freqency — meaning they may appear not as often as the most influential nodes but they are important narrative shifting points.

These are usually brokers between different clusters / communities of nodes, playing not easily noticed and yet important role in this network, like the "grey cardinals" of sorts.

These are usually brokers between different clusters / communities of nodes, playing not easily noticed and yet important role in this network, like the "grey cardinals" of sorts.

Emerging Keywords

N/A

Evolution of Topics

(frequency / time) ?
↻

The chart shows how the main topics and the most influential keywords evolved over time. X-axis: time period (split into 10% blocks). Y-axis: cumulative frequency of occurrence.

Drag the slider to see how the narrative evolved over time. Select the checkbox to recalculate the metrics at every step (slower, but more precise).

Drag the slider to see how the narrative evolved over time. Select the checkbox to recalculate the metrics at every step (slower, but more precise).

Main Topics

(according to Latent Dirichlet Allocation):LDA stands for Latent Dirichlet Allocation — it is a topic modelling algorithm based on calculating the maximum probability of the terms' co-occurrence in a particular text or a corpus.

We provide this data for you to be able to estimate the precision of the default InfraNodus topic modeling method based on text network analysis.

We provide this data for you to be able to estimate the precision of the default InfraNodus topic modeling method based on text network analysis.

Most Influential Words

(main topics and words according to LDA):Sentiment Analysis

positive: | negative: | neutral:

⤓ ? ⤓

We analyze the sentiment of each statement to see whether it's positive, negative, or neutral. You can filter the statements by sentiment (clicking above) and see what kind of topics correlate with every mood.

The approach is based on AFINN and Emoji Sentiment Ranking

The approach is based on AFINN and Emoji Sentiment Ranking

Text Statistics:

Word Count | Unique Lemmas | Characters | Lemmas Density |

0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |

Network Statistics:

Top Relations / Bigrams

(both directions):
The most prominent relations between the nodes that exist in this graph are shown above. We treat the graph as undirected by default as it allows us to better detect general patterns.

As an option, you can also downloaded directed bigrams above, in case the direction of the relations is important (for any application other than language).

As an option, you can also downloaded directed bigrams above, in case the direction of the relations is important (for any application other than language).

Please, enter a search query to visualize the difference between what people search for (related queries) and what they actually find (search results):

Find a market niche for a certain product, category, idea or service: what people are looking for but cannot yet find*

Please, enter your query to visualize Google search results as a graph, so you can learn more about this topic:

Enter a search query to analyze the Twitter discourse around this topic (last 7 days):